The Analyzer · from Kind Robots

You built it. Now know what you’ve got.

One plain-language report on how secure, solid, and well-made your software really is — where it’s strong, where it’s exposed, and what to fix first. Made for founders who build with AI.

Your code is isolated during analysis and automatically deleted after. Always.

You built it — now know it holds up

You didn’t wait for permission to build.

You had an idea, you described what you wanted, and you made it real. It works. People are using it. That’s the hard part — and you did it.

And somewhere in the back of your mind, a quieter question keeps surfacing: is it actually solid underneath?

You’re not an engineer, and you don’t need to become one. But you can’t currently answer that question — and the people who will eventually ask it can.

The Analyzer answers it first.

Submit your codebase. Get back one clear report: where it’s strong, where it’s exposed, and the short list of what to fix — written so you can read it, accurate enough that the next engineer who reviews you would recognize it.

Walk in with answers

Sooner or later, someone technical will ask you these.

An acquirer, an enterprise customer’s security team, an investor’s reviewer — they all work from a version of the same list. It’s not a trap. It’s a checklist. Here’s what’s on it, and what you can say once you’ve run the Analyzer.

  1. 01

    What security vulnerabilities are in your codebase right now?

    After your report: You have the list — every known vulnerability found, from your own code to the packages you rely on, ranked by severity with plain instructions for fixing it.

  2. 02

    Walk me through your technology choices — why is it built this way?

    After your report: You have a plain-language read on how your product is put together — the technology and architectural decisions behind it, and which ones deserve a second look.

  3. 03

    Can it handle the load when your product takes off?

    After your report: You have an honest read on the structural choices that matter under load — and which ones to revisit before growth makes them expensive.

  4. 04

    Has anyone outside your team ever reviewed this code?

    After your report: Yes — and you can hand them the report that came out of it.

  5. 05

    If you hired an engineer tomorrow, could they take this codebase over?

    After your report: You have an honest read on how maintainable it is — including what's genuinely well-built — before their first day.

  6. 06

    How will you handle a compliance review or a customer security audit?

    After your report: You'll answer from evidence: an independent, plain-language analysis of your codebase — the kind those reviews ask to see.

That’s the whole idea. Not fear — preparation. Walk in already knowing the answers.

The deliverable

Here’s the report — before you spend anything.

No mystery about what you’re buying. Every analysis ends in one readable report, and it looks like this.

Sample

ANALYSIS REPORT — SAMPLEProject: your-appScope: full codebase

A well-structured application with real strengths — and a short list of issues worth fixing, two of them before your next serious customer conversation.

  • Passwords and logins are handled by a mature, well-maintained approach — not hand-rolled.
  • The codebase is consistently organized; a new engineer could find their way around.
  • No customer data is written to logs.
  • A live secret key is sitting inside the code — anyone with a copy of the code has it.
  • Two packages you rely on carry known vulnerabilities with fixes already available.
  • The way the app talks to its database won’t keep up when traffic grows.
  • 2 Critical
  • 3 High
  • 5 Medium
  • 9 Low

2 critical findings — see the examples →

1 / 3Overview

Page 1 of 3Overview

This is a sample, not your report. Yours will be about your codebase — same plain language, same strengths-first structure, same ranked fix list. What you’ll never see: a “100% secure” badge or a pass/fail grade. Software doesn’t work that way, and we won’t pretend it does.

How it works

From your code to one clear report — in five steps.

Here’s exactly what happens after you submit — including the two things that set the Analyzer apart: your code is walled off while it’s analyzed, and automatically deleted when the job is done.

  1. 01

    Submit

    A zip or a git link. You choose exactly what gets analyzed.

  2. 02

    Sealed off

    Analyzed inside a sealed, single-use space, walled off from everything else — designed with no path to leak out.

  3. 03

    Analyzed

    A battery of checks examines it — from known vulnerabilities to how it’s built.

  4. 04

    One report

    It all comes together in one clear, readable report — your strengths, the findings, and the specific gaps worth addressing.

  5. 05

    Auto-deleted

    Then your code is automatically deleted — on a clock, by design. We don’t keep it.

Trust & safety

Your code is handled with care.

You’re trusting us with your source code. We’ve built the Analyzer around that responsibility from the ground up.

  • Isolated by design

    Your code is analyzed inside a sealed, single-use environment that's walled off from everything else and torn down when the job is done. It's designed with no open path to phone home, leak out, or touch another customer's work.

  • Deleted on a clock

    We don't keep your code. After a set retention window it's automatically deleted — deletion is built into how the system runs, not left to someone remembering to do it.

  • Honest about AI

    Every report is written up in plain language by an AI service, which sees the type and severity of what we found — never your code, your file names, or anything that identifies you. If you also choose the AI review, that part does send your code to an external model, and we tell you clearly before any of it leaves.

Find out what you’ve got.

Create your account, tell us what you’re building and what you most want to know, and we’ll show you exactly what your first scan will look at. Two minutes, three questions, and the quiet question stops being quiet.

Your code is isolated during analysis and automatically deleted after.